There is no denying the fact that âFaith integrated upon a religion may perhaps be idiosyncratic conviction in a god or godsâ which exist in the sore traditional activity of human being as one is supposed to activate oneâs perpetual faith by continuous supplication as a tentative flow. Some religions have many gods; some have only one and even some religions are theistic; others are not, even though these are popular and remarkable traditionally in some particular regions. In India, Bangladesh, China, and Nepal and even in Great Britain, such theistic peopleâs religions are found out.
Suffice it to say that Faith developed upon a religion is the reverse of a faith interacted upon a creed, which is acceptable that there is no god. Biblical faith interacted upon a religion is the code in the Judeo-Christian God, i.e., the God presented in the Bible and ever since, Biblical faith interacted upon a religion covers countless subtopics. A cram of the God of the Bible will inevitably center attention on the Godhead, self-assured of the Father, Son, and hallowed Spirit. It exchanges a few words to the nature and characteristic of God, the pre-existence and deity of Christ, the person and modus operandi of the Holy Spirit, and a host of other subcategories. For reserve information about biblical faith interacted upon a religion, we can find many important criteria in this universe. Our secular and humanistic society now generally rejects biblical faith interacted upon a religion; although a majority in our society may articulate in the sense that they accept as true in the God of the Bible, they also pass their remark in the way that their belief in God has little to do with the technique as they conduct their lives to give as good as you get their day to day situations. Institutions of big business, governments, commerce, industry, and education operate more by secular and humanistic principles than by principles of biblical faith interacted upon a religion. For information on the subject of humanistic philosophies contrasting to biblical faith interrelated upon a religion, we can face Philosophical faith interacted upon a religion of Humanism expressed in terms of communism of equal rights to establish uniformity in respect of castes and creeds.
There is no denying the fact that weâre in a Cultural War and even itâs a spiritual war too to retaliate our real life situation. Itâs a philosophical war in the sense that itâs a very practical war. This is a spiritual war for the reason that it is a race between high-quality and malevolence, between decency and indulgence. This is a philosophical war because it is a contest between biblical faith interacted upon a religion and modern humanism, between Godâs word and human judgment. This is a practical war because it is about human conduct in social and cultural practices. Itâs about whether a society can abide if it tolerates such things as abortion, divorce, gambling, pornography, homosexuality, sexual promiscuity, etc. To win this war, theists must be well-versed about the truth-seeking foundations of both sides, about goals and objectives, about strategies and tactics, and about how to be actively complicated in this conflict. For theists, the philosophical nitty-gritty of this war is set forth in scripture. For humanists, the philosophical brass tacks are from human reasoning as declared in humanistic books and documents. Because theists are generally not familiar with the writings of humanists, theists generally do not understand why we are in a cultural war and that humanists are at this time captivating this war. This war is being fought in many arenas â ethics, financial side, schooling, law, politics, religion, etc. Activists are to be found on the streets, in public school classrooms, at workplaces, in churches, and in the halls of civil governments.
This is an inquiring feeling whether we are involved or not in regard to the ethical prospects of life which predominates a man to seek truth which are vitally desired for spiritual as well as eternal life. Theists are generally active in churches and homes, but the humanistic philosophy of secularism has now generally barred faith cooperated upon a religion from workplaces, educational classrooms, and the halls of civil governments. The only way for theists to stop this rising humanistic way of life and its disparaging morally wrong charged is for well-versed theists to confront the philosophy of humanism with the attitude of faith intermingle upon a religion in every arena of life. To put in the picture to others if we have the same opinion that these matters are worthy of greater absorption and that they impress to be squabbled more fully among Christians. AIK is a new probabilistic argument alongside the continuation of the Christian God. According to one translation of the argument, if the Christian God existed he would ensure that all human beings have an excellent knowledge of the Bible before they die. But, as a matter of chronological fact, most human beings do not even get close to having an excellent knowledge of the Bible before they die. Therefore, the Christian God probably doesn’t exist. Ted Drange develops two arguments for the nonexistence of the God of evangelical Christianity, an all-powerful and loving being greatly concerned about the fate of human beings and desiring a personal liaison with them. According to his argument from confusion, extensive puzzlement stuck between Christians over matters of ultimate consequence entailed that the God of evangelical Christianity in all probability does not exist. In particular, the uncontrolled diversification of Christian sects on such matters entails that, even if any one of those sects is correct, large numbers of Christians must hold false beliefs about concern of eventual importance–contrary to what one would predict if the God of evangelical Christianity existed. The argument from biblical imperfection contends that if the God of evangelical Christianity existed, then the Bible would probably be flawlessly comprehensible and trustworthy and lacking marks of solely human authorship; but since the Bible does not meet either of these criteria, the God of evangelical Christianity probably does not exist.
“Set apart this stipulation, beloved Lord,” George Fox and Phil Smith had articulated sympathetically into the microphone, “and shortcoming will we seize delivery of it in the spirit in which some one gave it to some body.” They are being university professors self-confident about their faiths and achievements stated that the Christians seated around the banquet tables in the large student union had their heads bowed reverently while the nonbelievers, lost in their own thoughts, waited patiently for the thanksgiving prayer to finish. Their eyes were closed up tight, his squint embellished by his chunky glasses. When he had completed his supplication, a choral group of deep “amenâs” echoed from induction to end the large hall. Now that the food had been hallowed, the attendees at the Society of Philosophers were ready to march up to the buffet table and eagerly partake of their fair share. Here, among theist and agnostic thinkers from all parts of the globe, opportunist philosophical arguments and debates would begin to take shape. Amidst the clank of utensil on plate after everyone had been dished up their food, tête-à -tête hastily crooked back to idealistic talk of space and time, the veridicality of credence in God, Darwinian point of view from malevolence, and whether or not so and so will as a final point stop working from training relevant to the particular time frame.. Somewhere off in a corner an apprentice participated a heavy-eyed piece of music on a majestic piano. At one table, Peter Forrest hailing from Australia resumed a topic near and dear to his heart: the disambiguation of time. “The transcendentalist doesn’t in fact get higher,” he asserted while holding his hand out flat and unhurriedly raising it up to impersonate the yogi’s feat. “Instead,” Forrest unremitting, “he loses the differentiation connecting the typical means of access of time and the submissive sequential order in which the flow of time seems to slow to a crawl.” A graduate student next to him who had been carefully listening frowned. Forrest seemed energized by this skepticism and his grin spread wider on his face while his brown tangled hair bounced wildly. Clearly, Forrest was happiest when the subject gravitated toward A- and B-theories of time and whether or not time passes in discrete units or was rather like Plato’s “moving image of eternity.”
Subsequently, all and sundry had earnestly frenzied the baked salmon and cheesecake, Paul K. Moser, Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University, discharged the keynote address. However, to his shame he initiated that one thing kept distracting him from his interesting presentation. No matter how hard I tried to ignore it, he couldn’t help but notice that Moser bore a striking resemblance to the popular portrayals of Jesus Christ. From his shoulder-length brown hair, to his sparkling eyes, long thin nose, and carefully trimmed beard, I would have believed the chef were he to tell me that Moser himself divided just two salmon into two hundred for our banquet that night. Moser’s talk was passionate and he was obviously in command of his material. He argued that to seek propositional belief that God exists was tantamount to idolatry because it seeks the knowledge of God rather than a relationship with God. “For our own good,” Moser said, “we are not in charge of God or of available evidence for God. We must know God as Reconciling Lord of our lives, given God’s redemptive program.”
Thus, a proper epistemology, Moser insisted, is one that hunt for a relationship with the redeeming God of Israel rather than one that seeks justified true belief that God exists. To seek mere existence of God, Moser said, is to trivialize God and to put God into human terms. Only when one is properly oriented toward God can one see that life is a gift. Then one can behave accordingly with “self-giving trust, gratitude, and humility” toward God. The atheist, Moser pronounced, sees the universe as an accidental fluke; therefore, he responds to the universe with “self-protecting control, self-crediting, fear, striving, and pride.” While the atheist experiences “despair, pessimism, anxiety, and worry,” Moser argued, the Christian experiences “hope, optimism, mercy, and forgiveness.” Moser called the proper view of God an “epistemology of Gethsemane” which is to say, “not my will but Thy Will.” opportunity the conference’s First Plenary Session on Thursday morning, Professor Paul Draper, Florida International University delivered a paper entitled “Seeking but not Believing: Confessions of a Practicing Agnostic.” “I’ve got to warn you guys,” Draper had told us shortly ahead of time, “the paper I’m about to give will appeal greatly to the theists.” Draper did not disappoint. Before his talk began, he asked everyone to pray for Brian Leftow, who had been scheduled to deliver a paper but was too ill to attend the conference. In his presentation, Draper squabbled that he was a fence sitter because the verification both for and against naturalism and faith acted together upon a religion was evenly divided. Draper used the analogy of red and blue jelly beans to illustrate the evidence that came to bear on the problem of naturalism versus faith collaborated upon a religion. A red bean symbolized a piece of confirmation in favor of naturalism while a blue bean represented an argument that seemed to weigh in favor of faith intermingled upon a religion. With a total of five red beans and five blue beans, Draper was undecided about the issue and remarked that he needed more time to weigh all of the arguments. “I’m waiting, indeed hoping, to be pulled over to one side,” he confessed. Draper’s honesty seemed to set the right tone for the conference. While both theists and atheists alike would fervently disagree, everyone had the utmost respect for opposing points of view. During the break, Phil Fernandez, an evangelical Christian minister who described himself as coming from the Van Tillman school of thought, recognized Jeff and walked up to say hello. “Still in the Infidel business?” he asked with a grin. “What else?” Jeff replied. Fernandez was an easygoing beneficiary, stocky and athletic, speedy with a smile and possessing an engaging personality. After introducing him to Theodore Drange, Jeff introduced Fernandes to me. “Oh yeah, you’re the guy who wrote a bad review of my book,” Fernandes said slowly while forcefully gripping my hand. I quickly tried to recall what his book was about and what I had said but my mind went blank. “I hope it wasn’t too awful,” I accessible in retort. “Well,” he said, “some of my colleagues were pretty upset by what you wrote but I wasn’t bothered by it too much.” We were late for the second plenary gathering so we speedily enveloped up our introductions. William Lane Craig, from the Talbot School of Theology, was going to speak on naturalism, cosmology, and present his trademark kalam cosmological argument for the existence of God.
In view of the above it is evident that religion leads humans how to lead life controlled and cleanly and from such concepts, supplication for the sake of almighty has been dedicated and it is inevitable to hold faith in running day to day activities of life. We are habituated to deal life selfishly in order to achieve maximum interest in life. But the true religion teaches mankind how to achieve purity of life. Purity signifies humans real equity, justice, humanity and trustworthy of life. Real belief is quite different phenomena with which one can reach the reality of creation. In the whole world, all sorts of crisis are prevailing on a large scale such as crisis of food; shelter and clothing are nowadays a dominant issue. In the language of Economics, our hierarchical needs are physiological, safety, security, egoistic and self actuality needs which play a vital part to be satisfied as oneâs birth right against scarcity, choice and opportunity cost. Due to the fact, no one is satisfied in the world whatever they posses in the eternal world. For this reason, unrest movement against economy, commerce and trade are predominating and every one runs after momentary happy. Hence, in order to bring a peaceful world, the importance of religion in menâs life cannot be ignored. Hence, our duty towards mankind is great and compulsory but we forget and eternity becomes the mainstream of life. We should be careful about the rights of humans and whatever we posses, we should utilize them in a systematic manner. In this context, a few lines of poem composed by Robert Frost is worth mentioning:
âThe wood is lovely, dark and deep
I have promises to keep
And I have miles to go before I sleep
And I have miles to go before I sleepâ
One God one Religion
Dalip Singh Wasan, Advocate.
All the people in this world accept that there is one and only one God and we all are the children of the same one God and therefore, we are not different, but members of one and same family. This admissions is just formal because where-ever we go we find the people divided in religions, in castes, in economic groups, in sub castes and in countries and at the same time we find that the people are not one but they think differently, they eat differently, they speak differently and they wear on clothes differently just to establish that they are not one with all, but they are different people. And the whole history of this mankind is written with the ink of blood of this man. At each stage of history of this mankind they had been at war with each other and they had been killing the people just to establish that their religion is better and is more stronger, their country is great and more powerful and we had noted in history that there had been forced conversions and people of one religion had been demolishing religious places of other religions and similarly they had been destroying religious books of other religions. One set of people had been trying to establish that they were great and the people from the other side had been declaring that the people killed were great martyrs. Though no religion approved all these killings, yet there had been killings and therefore, we should accept that this man could not understand the real meaning of religion and he just befooling others that he is a religious person. We have noted that people of one religion are trying to wear such clothes and cutting their hairs in such a style that they should distinguish themselves separately and should not mix with others. And hence this family of God could not remain one house or home, but it is now divided into different countries, different religions, different castes, different economic groups and the like and all are trying to establish that they are better or the best from the others.
So the concept of one God one religion is no more in operation and we must accept that the stage on which this mankind has reached, it would not allow the people to establish one religion for all the people i.e. a common religion nor we shall be having a common economic standard for all on this world. People who are stronger shall be looting the people who are weak and therefore, one set of people shall be turning rich and the other set of people shall be reduced to poverty. This division of this mankind into two economic groups is more dangerous because this division shall further separate one group from the other. The rich group shall be established their own colonies and the people from the weaker sections shall be constrained to establish their separate colonies and the whole social life shall be divided amongst rich and poor. This mankind shall be having further divisions on these economic groups i.e. the rich shall be having some grades and similarly the poor shall also be having sections on the same lines as the people are divided on the basis of religions, castes and then sub castes. There seems no stage at which stage the people shall be becoming one and one only. The division of this mankind shall go further and there seems no end to this division and that is the reason they shall be dividing God in different parts. The concept of one God is gone because it is on books and in real and practical life, this man has already divided God into different parts and even God Himself shall not be able to unite Himself into one. We have seen this division since centuries and had there been a powerful God, He could have united Himself into one. But it is not so. There are divisions and now these divisions are becoming permanent and we must accept that there shall be another world war between the two religions and one religion shall try to finish the people of the other religion. Let us see who wins this war, but the war is very near and everybody in these both the religions is trying to become stronger so that they could establish their victory.
If God is one and one only, then God should come down and establish one religion throughout this world and the division on the basis of different religions, castes, sub castes and countries should stop and this mankind should be turned into one family and only then the wish of God shall be fulfilled. The man shall get more time to discover and invent and this earth of us shall turn a Heaven and we shall not be praying for another Heaven after our death. But God is not accepting our prayer and the division of this mankind is still going on and we do not know the end of this division. There is nothing in the hands of this mankind because all efforts made update have failed and none could join all the religions into one religion. Till these religions and sub religions are there, even God shall not be able to establish Himself into one. God has already divided into parts and that is the reason God has become weaker. Even God Himself is not giving the right direction to this man. The man is going astray and is turning this earth into a real Hell. God must stop this man because God never wished that this earth should be a living Hell and all the people on this earth should turn Devils or followers of the Devil.
——————————
For example, if you were born into ancient Egypt, you would follow the ancient Egyptian religion, and those born today in say Texas, would follow Christianity, as those in Iran would be Muslim.
So is it not ever so slightly obvious that religion is all just made up nonsense?
Surely if there was a god we would all have the same religion by now?
The main music in the video is “Funky Like Humans” by Odd One Out. Song used with permission. The intro music was created by Imrational. Maryland’s anti-atheist law was overturned decades ago. Regarding North Carolina’s & South Carolina’s anti-atheist laws newsweek.washingtonpost.com The George Bush Sr quote is in dispute. The only admitted witness to the quote was the journalist who reported it. His secondary witness denied hearing the quote and the journalist changed his comments regarding …
God and Religion have lost their role
Dalip Singh Wasan, Advocate.
If we go deep into the mind of this man on earth we come to the conclusion that this man on this earth has lost faith in God and he is following a religion in a formal way. Most of the religions and people in those religions have taken up their religions as political units and they have started to surpass the other religions. They are coming with new meanings of their texts and they are telling the people that their religions is telling something which is not available in texts of other religions. Similarly they are coming with stories which are in their mythologies and they are telling us that their prophets were more powerful than prophets in other religions.
In fact that this man has traveled centuries when he firstly declared that there is a God who had created this world, this universe and then this man on this earth. They gave all power to God and then they started worshiping and praying before that God. They had been on this path since centuries and we have seen that this man could not become religious nor he could completely had faith in God and left all his activities to God. We have seen that this man had been praying to God but he never left his own efforts. There had been prayers, but at the same time this man had been at work and we have noted that at most of the times this man had been believing in his own efforts and he was just having some help from the side of God. But he had been successful he never thanked God but had been boasting that he himself had been working hard and that is the reason, he could succeed.
The man had been believing in one of their religions on this earth and he had been hating the people in the other religions and it is on record that people in one religion had been trying to persuade others to join their religion and if they had been powerful they had been forcing conversion and it is also on record that the people who were not agreeing to convert were killed . It is also on record that that the religious places of one religions had been demolished and on those very places the rulers had been constructing religious places of their own religions, though no religious books allows such conversions and such demolitions. All these non-religious acts had been there which clearly means that this man had not been obeying the directions given to them by their prophets.
Today when the man has entered the age of science and technology, he has adopted a new way of life. If they are performing some religious ceremonies these are just formal and they try to establish that their religion is still alive. If we conduct a survey of police stations, the courts and the jails, we shall find people of all the religions and we shall find that they all had been committing crimes, sins and misconducts of the same type irrespective of their religions. When they people commit some crime, sin or misconduct they forget to which religion they belong. Similarly when they commit crimes, sins and misconducts, they forget that God is there and He shall be punishing them. It seems the people have got no real faith in God and in any religion because they had been violating all the norms set by God and by the religions and history is full of crimes, sins and misconducts. No religion and even God could not set this man right. Some wise people, some intellectuals and scholars had been writing down explanations of religious texts and some had been writing books on art of living and we have noted that instead of original texts, the people are liking these new books and new philosophy of life. They are trying to follow this new philosophy and they have started saying that old religions are making us fundamentalists and the present age does not like people who are fundamentalists. There is war between these two sets of people and one has turned terrorists and the other has turned rioter and they both are killing the people of the other wing. The whole world has become Kurkshetra and nobody on this earth is safe. No country is safe and that is the reason most of the time of the people is spent in attacking others and most of the time is spent in saving oneself. No body know that would be the next step of this man on this earth when he shall not be believing in God and in religion.
———————
Have they really found the missing link? Or are Darwinianists just blindly worshipping roadkill again?
Darwinism is an ancient shamanistic religion built on superstitions of all kinds. The origins of shamanism go back some 50,000 years.
• Shamanism is a belief system based on the worship of forces such as rain, snow, lightning, storms, wind, and the Sun. Darwinism is also a religion of nature-worship; it describes nature as an entity with “mythical and mysterious powers.” It anticipates the belief that stone, earth, the Sun, lightning and wind combined to give rise to life.
• Shamans claim to be the physicians, sages, leaders and administrators of their tribes and societies. Darwinists describe themselves in the same way. Shamans maintain that they understand the secrets of nature and can foretell the future. Similarly, Darwinists maintain that they know the secrets of matter, the atom and the Earth, and seek to describe imaginary changes that human beings and nature will be subject to in the future.
• Astronomy, biology, paleontology, physics, geology, chemistry, geophysics, embryology are all sciences. Darwinism, however, is not a science, but a primitive shamanistic religion.
Darwinists’ present-day beliefs are just as odd and irrational as those of people who once worshipped crocodiles. Darwinists regard chance and inanimate, unconscious atoms as a creative force, and are as devoted to that belief as if to a religion.
- Since the theory of evolution was first put forward, advances in a great many branches of science, have demolished the theory’s claims, one by one. Nonetheless, Darwinism still has its adherents. Typically, when a scientific theory is disproved, it is shelved, and all debate and discussion comes to an end. But not so with Darwinism. No matter how powerful and indisputable the evidence against their theory may be, evolutionists ignore it and continue to defend their beliefs in a fervent manner.
- Worshipping fire, the stars or the Sun, believing that the Pyramids were built by aliens, or venerating certain animals as sacred is not scientific. In the same way, neither is Darwinism–because just like other superstitious beliefs, Darwinism is also a religion of idols and false deities.
Members of the shamanistic religion of Darwinism spread fictitious reports about the future and try to bring new converts under their spell.
- Darwinism’s foremost idol is the “idol of chance.” Whatever Darwinist text you read, you will see claims about the power and limitless abilities of “natural selection,” the lifeblood and essence of Darwinism.
- Evolutionists claim that everything performed by the “idol of chance” is actually based on pragmatic calculations. In their view, this idol is able to consider everything and calculate in advance every step it will take.
- Evolutionists believe in one very strange force. They ascribe divine status to matter. They have belief that matter once assembled itself into a living cell and that one organism can give rise to another, entirely different one. Science has refuted these ideas. But for Darwinists, they are irrefutable facts that everyone must believe.
- Darwinism is an ancient shamanistic religion, built on insane and irrational superstitions and falsehoods. This idolatrous religion has been invented to confront Islam.
- According to the shamanistic religion of Darwinism, earth, water, rock and stone can feel, smell, hear and perceive colors.
Pagan societies have existed on Earth since the very earliest times. People at all times and all societies have fashioned different idols for themselves. In the same way that Darwinists adopt chance and inanimate matter as creative entities, similar imaginings were once adopted as idols by societies with warped beliefs. Above: Images depicting the Sumerian water idols.
- The essence of the religion of Darwinists is their nonsensical belief in chance that violates both science and reason. In fact, any rational mind is quite able to conceive that no complex entity can come into being spontaneously, by chance, but absolutely must be the product of a conscious plan. However, just like pagans who worship the idols they have crafted with their own hands, Darwinists believe in false deities.
- The nonsensical belief that Darwinists have adopted bears a very close resemblance to the beliefs of ancient pagan cultures. In the much same way that pagans believe that inanimate idols created all things, so evolutionists and materialists believe that inanimate matter created all living things. (God is surely beyond these.) They claim that even their own human bodies are the sum total of various coincidences.
- It is unacceptable for students to be taught Darwinist shamanistic religion under the name of science. What they need are courses in biology that have been purged of this shamanistic religion.
- The Turkish public laughs at the ruses resorted to by local evolutionists, because they cannot prove evolution by way of slander and aggression. Any evidence they have, they should put forward, whereupon everyone can easily distinguish between truth and error. For months now, the exhibitions of fossils taking place all over the country have helped the Turkish public realize that living things never underwent evolution.
- It is expected that evolutionists exhibit fossils if they have any. At the very least, they should display a few of them in the central headquarters or gardens of Turkish daily newspapers such as Cumhuriyet, Vatan and Hurriyet, or in such heavily frequented public spaces such as Istanbul’s Taksim Square or Ulus in Ankara. If they cannot do that, then they should cease their defense of evolution. They have no intermediate-form fossils to show, because such things never existed.
- Each fossil that evolutionists have put forward as a proof of evolution has turned out to be a fake or else misinterpreted. “Piltdown Man,” for example, turned out to be a hoax. The tooth of Nebraska “Man” turned out to be from a fossil boar. The coelacanth has been caught alive—and unchanged—since 1938. All the skull and bone fragments that allegedly show the human evolution tale have been proven to be either those of present-day human beings or else of species of ape that have become extinct.
Evolutionists conjure up creatures that never actually existed and hire skilled artists to produce “reconstructed” models and illustrations—which they use to try and convince people that evolution is a scientific fact. This false evidence is displayed in newspapers, magazines and museums. But these depictions reflect nothing beyond their makers’ imaginations. No such entities exist in the fossil record. Yet evolutionists themselves finally fall under the spell of this false evidence they have created with their own hands and start to believe in the religion of Darwinism.
SCIENTIFIC FACTS REFUTE THE CLAIMS OF THE
“SHAMANISTIC RELIGION OF DARWINISM”
According to the Shamanistic Religion of Darwinism: the first living organism formed spontaneously.
According to modern science, life cannot come into being by chance. Not one single protein or even a single cell, let alone a whole organism, can emerge by chance. The likelihood of any protein emerging by chance is only 1 in 10950. In practical terms, this equates to zero probability.
According to the Shamanistic Religion of Darwinism: living species descended from earlier, more primitive ones.
According to modern science, species cannot descend from one another. Every life form has its own unique characteristics. It is impossible for them to develop through another species’ gradual changes.
According to the Shamanistic Religion of Darwinism: fossils confirm the theory of evolution.
According to modern science, fossils are evidence of creation, not evolution. Some 100 million fossils have so far been discovered, and all of them represent complete, fully formed organisms. Not a single fossil indicates that it was undergoing any transitional “evolution.”
According to the Shamanistic Religion of Darwinism: species diversified through mutations.
According to modern science, mutations damage organisms, and do not improve them. They cannot cause a species to diversify: they either kill or cripple the mutated individual.
According to the Shamanistic Religion of Darwinism: humans are descended from ape-like creatures.
According to modern science, apes and humans are totally separate species. There is no family relationship between them. Despite their physical similarities, they have enormous differences that cannot be explained by claims of evolution.
According to the Shamanistic Religion of Darwinism: natural selection present in nature is proof of evolution.
According to modern science, natural selection cannot cause one living thing to evolve or give rise to new life forms.
TWO NEW DECEPTIONS FROM EVOLUTIONISTS:
TIKTAALIK ROSEAE AND GOGONASUS
The fossil discovered in Canada a few months ago and given the name of Tiktaalik roseae was portrayed as major evidence for evolution. In fact, however, this creature is obviously a “mosaic” combining a great many features. Nonetheless, evolutionists depict this creature as an intermediate species and claim, using fictitious illustrations, that it represents proof of a transition from water to land. The platypus found in modern-day Australia is also a mosaic creature that shares mammalian, reptilian and bird characteristics at one and the same time. Yet nothing about it can be depicted as proof of evolution.
In recent days, evolutionists have brought up yet another fossil found in Australia, repeating their tales that have persisted for so many years of a “completed missing link.” This new fossil, known as Gogonasus and evidently an extinct species of fish, has nothing whatsoever to do with evolution. Evolutionists seek to use it as an evidence for their myth of the transition from water to dry land, particularly on account of its fin bones, but the fossil in question is an obvious species of fish totally unconnected with life on land. The coelacanth, still alive today, also has bones in its fins, but these have been established to be perfectly ordinary structures that the fish uses solely for the purpose of swimming.
In order to substantiate their claims, evolutionists must discover “intermediate forms,” with deficient, half-formed organs that are not fully functional. Yet every one of the organs possessed by these fossil creatures is complete, flawless. There are no semi-developed organs, nor any fossil series that can be presented as evidence for an evolutionary transition from other living species.
Evolutionists must finally accept the facts and stop trying to deceive the public with their fabrications.
MATERIALIST SELF-INTEREST CABALS ARE UP TO NEW CONSPIRACIES
In recent months, both the Turkish and the world media have been issuing panicked reports about the global defeat of Darwinism. The routing of Darwinism has had a deep impact on European Freemasonry and certain other secret forces, and these have resorted to a plan produced out of terror of the threat of the elimination of atheism and materialism. British and French lodges have issued directives. Sabbatean families are also becoming involved, out of a thirst for vengeance. In order that the matter should be definitively resolved, various writers are being hired out, and a plot is being prepared against all patriotic individuals. The principal target is the Science Research Foundation.
In the future, however, just as in the past, it will be impossible for these endeavors to bear any fruit. Millions are aware of just what is going on. A new Sun has risen, and its light has illuminated all parts. The next thing for evolutionists to do is submit in the face of the facts.
ISLAM CONFLICTS WITH PAGAN RELIGIONS, NOT WITH SCIENCE
Islam commands people to research and investigate all branches of science and knowledge:
. . . Reflect on the creation of the heavens and the Earth . . . (Surah Al Imran, 191)
Have they not looked at the sky above them: how We structured it . . . (Surah Qaf, 6)
. . . You will not find any flaw in the creation of the All-Merciful. Look again . . . (Surat al-Mulk, 3)
Man has only to look at what he was created from. (Surat at-Tariq, 5)
Have they not looked at the camel—how it was created, and at the sky—how it was raised up, and at the mountains—how they were embedded, and at the Earth—how it was smoothed out? (Surat al-Ghashiyya, 17-20)
In the heavens and Earth there are certainly signs for the believers. And in your creation and all the creatures He has spread about there are signs for people with certainty. (Surat al-Jathiyya, 3-4)
It is therefore impossible to claim any divergence between science and Islam.
However, Islam does oppose all false religions. It is opposed to the worship of fire, of the devil, animals or idols—in short, to all forms of pagan belief. Shamanism is a religion that also worships chance and nature (animals, plants, stones, earth and matter). As a shamanistic creed, Darwinism is therefore in conflict with Islam.
Under the pen name of Harun Yahya, Adnan Oktar has written some 250 works. His books contain a total of 46,000 pages and 31,500 illustrations. Of these books, 7,000 pages and 6,000 illustrations deal with the collapse of the Theory of Evolution. You can read, free of charge, all the books Adnan Oktar has written under the pen name Harun Yahya on these websites www.harunyahya.com
There’s nothing wrong or immoral about being a nominal Christian, an earthly Christian, or an orthodox Christian. I call all of those Christian Lite. The Bible was written in Eastern mythological and metaphorical language. To try and make the Bible a literal historical record of events is to miss the esoteric messages which transform life!
Religion and many churches in America have made re-birth or being “born again” a three minute event that fits much like teh One-Minute Manager concept. Come forward after the second stanza and confess Jesus as your Lord and savior, fill out a membership card, join the orientation classes, and YOU ARE IN!
In to Christian Lite!
In Eastern Biblical language and images, MAN represents the lower state of those here on earth while HEAVEN (Kingdom of God) is symbolic of the evolving and higher consciousness of man. Luke 17:20 reminded us that the Kingdom of God is within and not some external “thing”. Between these two planes (heaven and earth) and various levels of porgression- advancement-consciousness.
John the baptizer is an excellent example.
Jesus says of John that “Among men (here on erth) born of a woman that there was none greater than John. John was at the top of the heap in the “earthly spehere”. John was Christian Lite! But, when it comes to comapring the John here on earth with the potentialities of John from a spiritual-heavenly view point, Jesus concludes, “The LEAST in the Kingdom of God was greater than John”.
Bummer, unless Christian Lite is your goal and in America it’s the prevailing purpose. In other words, John was living way below his purpose for being. Aren’t we all! Maurice Nicoll put it this way, “To pass from the highet stage on the lower level to the lowest stage on the higher level demans a re-birth or transformation of man. Jesus taught repentance and re-birth while John only taught repentance. John never was born from “above”. The descriptions of John affirm such (he wore skins, leather belt, and ate locusts.
John could only undersand from an “earth level” and so he came to question if Jesus was really who he had thought he was. Get the point? Unless we move into the deeper esoteric aspects of Jesus, who became the Christ, we will lapse into Christian Lite and eventually wind of questioning the existence of God.
But, NEW WINE can’t be put in your current stinking thinking (OLD WINE). 
The Holy Bible records Jesus ascending into heaven, having entrusted the care of His Church into the hands of his disciples. This group of men and women would become the first church, filled with the resurrection enthusiasm of their Messiah while attempting to live out his teaching and mission in practical ways.
A large part of the private prayers of its members followed typical Hebrew format. Praying three times a day became the daily office of the person, though, instead of a community encouraged practice. This adaptation was largely due to the problem that Christianity had not yet become a country-endorsed religion. Prayer was frequently found in the gatherings of the early church, offered frequently throughout the worship service with the Lord’s Prayer taking its place as the anchor – a common ritual in each gathering. This was due to the following reasons:
* A response to the many growing heresies.
* A summarizing of the whole New Testament just as the Ten Commandments had summarized the Old.
* A catalyst for community intercession and connection.
Elements of the oldest Christian liturgies may be found in liturgies such as the Orthodox Divine Liturgy, the Lutheran Divine Service, and Anglican sermons. Seasonal orthodox prayers such as found in the Breviary, which provides prayer for each liturgical season including Advent, Christmas, Easter, and Pentecost, as well as the other parts of the liturgical year.
In Orthodox tradition, prayers of petition may be addressed to saints. It is understood that the saints answer such prayers by means of their own prayers to God on behalf of the petitioner. The help of God may be done in a form of Miracles. Orthodox Christians believe that prayers for the dead are efficacious; for this reason, requiem Masses are offered for the repose of the faithful departed. Eastern Orthodoxy rejects the notion of Purgatory, but offers prayers for the dead asking God to have mercy upon them; in particular, that tradition believes that Christians who have died remain part of the Church, and as such are both able to pray and to receive the benefits of prayer for them, whatever those may be.
There is no one prayerbook containing a set liturgy used by all Christians; however many Christian denominations have their own local prayerbooks.